Synthesis Repertory: Editions, Structure & How to Access It

What the Synthesis repertory is: Schroyens' editorial method, the editions from 9.1 to Adonis, how it compares with Complete and Murphy, where you can (and can't) use it, and what fills its role online.

Marco Ruggeri

Marco Ruggeri·Founder of Similia

August 10, 20266 min read

A glowing open reference book radiating structured columns of light on a deep blue gradient, with translucent editorial checkmarks orbiting the pages, symbolising the curated editions of the Synthesis repertory.

Ask a roomful of homeopaths which repertory they reach for first and Synthesis will be one of the three or four names you hear. Alongside the Complete Repertory and Murphy's MetaRepertory, it is one of the great modern descendants of Kent — and of the three, it is the one built most explicitly around editorial control. This guide covers what Synthesis is, how it is organised, its editions, how it compares with its rivals, and — since a large share of the people searching for it are really asking an access question — where you can and cannot use it. (Written for practitioners and students, not as self-treatment advice.)

What Synthesis Is

Synthesis — the full Latin title is Repertorium Homeopathicum Syntheticum — is a modern homeopathic repertory edited by the Belgian homeopath Frederik Schroyens. Its method is in the name: a synthesis of the repertory tradition, taking Kent's Repertory as the skeleton and merging into it additions from the classical literature and from contemporary provings and clinical verification.

Two editorial decisions define the work:

  • Source-tagging. Additions carry abbreviations identifying their origin — which author, which proving, which clinical report. When you see a remedy in a rubric, you can ask on whose authority it is there, and Synthesis answers.
  • Verification before inclusion. Schroyens built an international editorial team around an explicit policy that material is checked before it enters the text. Where the Complete Repertory casts the widest possible net, Synthesis deliberately narrows the mesh: quality and reproducibility over maximal coverage.

That editorial posture is why teaching institutions have long favoured it, and why practitioners who distrust "rubric inflation" in modern repertories tend to be Synthesis loyalists.

Editions: from the print era to Adonis

Synthesis grew through numbered editions across the 1990s and 2000s, each expanding the verified additions over the Kentian base. For most of the world, the classic reference is Synthesis 9.1, the edition that circulated widely in print and became a standard exam and clinic companion; a further expanded Treasure Edition followed it. The print volumes are substantial — a single fat tome of fine-print rubrics — and second-hand copies still move briskly, which says something about the work's standing.

The current generation, however, is digital-only: Synthesis Adonis, the continuously updated line maintained inside RadarOpus. Like the Complete Repertory, Synthesis long ago outgrew the print cycle — corrections, new provings and new clinical confirmations accumulate faster than book editions can be justified — so the printed edition you can buy is a snapshot, and the living text is the one in the software.

How It Is Organised

Structurally, Synthesis is Kentian, and anyone who has learned Kent's chapter logic can navigate it immediately: Mind first, then Vertigo, Head, Eye and onward through the body to Generalities, with rubrics running from the general to the particular and remedies graded by type-face. Onto that skeleton Synthesis adds its own apparatus — the source abbreviations after remedy entries, cross-references between related rubrics, and progressively cleaned-up rubric language as editions advanced. The result reads as "Kent, annotated and audited" rather than as a reorganisation: unlike Murphy, which re-sorted everything into alphabetical clinical chapters, Synthesis kept the traditional architecture and invested in the scholarship inside it.

Synthesis vs. Complete vs. Murphy

The three modern repertories genuinely differ, and the differences matter clinically:

  • Synthesis — curation first. Verified, source-tagged additions on the Kentian frame. Choose it when you want to know exactly why every remedy sits in every rubric.
  • Complete Repertory — coverage first. The largest of the three, revised continually, absorbing new material fastest. Choose it when you want the widest net — the full guide to the Complete Repertory covers its history and scale.
  • Murphy's MetaRepertory — clinical speed first. Alphabetical, modern-language chapters built for consultation-room efficiency rather than scholarly apparatus. The three-way comparison sets them side by side in detail.

None of them replaces the classical texts they grew from; a prescriber who understands Kent, Boenninghausen and Boger can use any of the moderns critically instead of credulously.

Where You Can Use Synthesis — and Where You Can't

Here Synthesis differs from every other repertory discussed on this blog: it is exclusive to its own commercial platform. Synthesis is the in-house repertory of RadarOpus, and it is not licensed to third-party software — not to Similia, not to anyone else. Access today means one of three things: the RadarOpus desktop program (Windows/Mac, licence-based), the Synthesis App subscription from the same ecosystem, or a printed edition.

Two honest consequences follow:

There is no legal free download. Synthesis is copyrighted and actively maintained; the editorial work is the product. Sites offering "synthesis repertory software free download" are distributing pirated copies of outdated editions — the free-download reality check covers what those files actually contain and why a practice machine is the last place to run them.

If your school or method requires Synthesis specifically, RadarOpus is where it lives. No online platform can honestly tell you otherwise, and we won't.

If, on the other hand, what you actually need is a rigorous modern repertory rather than that specific title, the same clinical role is filled — legally and online — by the repertories Similia licenses: the Complete Repertory 2026 and Murphy's MetaRepertory as premium editions, layered on a free tier that includes seven complete classical repertories (Kent among them — the very base text Synthesis grew from), 13 classic materia medica books and AI semantic search. The hands-on 2026 software comparison puts Similia and RadarOpus side by side on features and pricing, and how repertory software works explains what any of these platforms actually does with a repertory once it's digital.

The Bottom Line

Synthesis is the repertory of editorial conscience: Kent's architecture, a generation of verified additions, and a source trail behind every remedy. It earned its place in the modern canon, and it remains a platform exclusive — priced, licensed and inseparable from RadarOpus. Know that going in, decide whether you need that book or that function, and choose your software accordingly: if it's the function, start with the free classical library and add a modern repertory when your practice asks for one.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Synthesis repertory?

Synthesis — in full, Repertorium Homeopathicum Syntheticum — is a modern homeopathic repertory edited by the Belgian homeopath Frederik Schroyens. It takes Kent's Repertory as its skeleton and expands it with additions from the wider literature under a strict editorial policy: entries are source-tagged and verified before inclusion. It became known through the print editions of the 1990s and 2000s (9.1 is the classic), and today lives primarily as the in-house repertory of the RadarOpus software platform.

Who wrote the Synthesis repertory?

It is edited rather than written: Frederik Schroyens, a Belgian homeopath and graduate of Ghent, has led the project since the early 1990s, coordinating an international editorial team. The base text is Kent's Repertory; the added material is drawn from classical and contemporary sources, each addition carrying an abbreviation identifying where it came from — one of the features practitioners value most in Synthesis.

Is there a free download of the Synthesis repertory software?

No legal one. Synthesis is a copyrighted, actively maintained work and has never been free; it is licensed through the RadarOpus ecosystem — the desktop program, the subscription-based Synthesis App, and the printed editions. Files offered as free downloads are pirated copies of outdated editions. If what you need is a large modern repertory rather than Synthesis specifically, the Complete Repertory 2026 and Murphy's MetaRepertory are licensed alternatives available online, on top of seven classical repertories that are genuinely free.

What is the difference between Synthesis and the Complete Repertory?

Both are modern descendants of Kent that record their sources, and the difference is emphasis. Synthesis prizes editorial control: a curated, verified body of additions, with quality and reproducibility as the watchwords. The Complete Repertory prizes coverage and updating speed: it casts the widest net and absorbs new material quickly, which is why it is the larger of the two. Neither is objectively superior, and experienced prescribers often cross-check a doubtful rubric across both.

Can I use Synthesis in Similia?

No — Synthesis is exclusive to its own platform and is not licensed to Similia, and we would rather say that plainly than imply otherwise. What Similia offers in the same clinical role: seven classical repertories free (including Kent, the base text Synthesis grew from), and the Complete Repertory 2026 and Murphy's MetaRepertory as premium editions, all in one browser-based interface with AI semantic search.

Ready to transform your practice?

No credit card required • Free forever for basic features