Back to changelog
Feature updateJul 31, 2026Pro
Remedy comparison
Chart how remedies — or whole families — distribute across a repertory, then read the rubrics behind every difference.
Ten remedies, every section
Add up to ten remedies and put their profiles side by side across the whole repertory, as a chart or as a table.
- Compare rubric counts section by section.
- Equalize by remedy so a small remedy can be read next to a polychrest.
- Equalize by remedy and section to take the repertory's own shape out of the picture.
- Switch to over- and under-represented to see where a remedy genuinely stands out.
- Narrow the section scope, or open a section to inspect the rubrics behind a bar.
Compare whole families
Change the subject from remedies to families and study one taxonomy group against the repertory baseline — or up to ten groups against each other.
- Choose a group from the Standard or the Scholten taxonomy.
- Every matched member counts equally, so a single large remedy cannot carry a family.
- Membership and coverage shows how many taxonomy members were matched in this repertory and how many were not.
- Advisories flag weak evidence and overlapping definitions before you read anything into the chart.
- Characteristic rubric prevalence separates what two families share from what belongs to only one of them.
The repertory itself — and the rubrics behind it
Before you have chosen anything, look at the repertory whole. Afterwards, read the actual rubrics rather than the bars.
- Whole-repertory statistics: rubrics, remedies, remedy links and median coverage.
- Top remedies by rubric coverage, and the leading remedies of each section.
- Shared rubrics lists what your selected remedies have in common, and how many of them share each one.
- See the rubrics that belong to one of your remedies alone.
- See where a large remedy is missing from well-populated rubrics — an absence of record, not a verdict.
